| Replies
|
|
|
dm13
|
Posted at 12:20 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| I'm pretty torn on this subject. I mean, I smoke weed and I'm looking for a job and its a pain in the ass to find one that doesn't drug test, so that is a bad thing. On the other hand I understand why businesses don't want drug users working for them, but at the same time what a worker does on their time is their business. The problem shouldn't be the worker being a drug user, the problem should be workers on drugs while at work, that should be grounds for immediate dismissal, imo. |
|
|
meghank91
|
Posted at 12:17 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| I got tested for drugs when I worked at a nursing home. It makes sense to me. Who wants a druggie stealing pills from old ladies? |
|
|
Acustico23
|
Posted at 12:15 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| It is an invasion of privacy. It should be assumed that you will do your work sober and not under the influence. You should only be tested if you are demonstrating signs of intoxication while on the job. What you do at home is no ones business in the work place. |
|
|
WAZ
|
Posted at 12:15 pm on July 3, 2009 |
Depends on the job. I know i wouldnt want a PCP using docter |
|
|
MushroomSatsujin
|
Posted at 12:14 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| For some jobs it is. In mine I work with machinery so Its understandable. But for the most part I see it as unnecessary. Just dont go to work fucked up. Thats just common sense. |
|
|
GIRAFFES
|
Posted at 12:13 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| I don't think it invades privacy. I think it's good, depending on the job. |
|
|
Angry Kumquat
|
Posted at 12:12 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| It's perfectly sensible. |
|
|
DaisyMontana
|
Posted at 12:12 pm on July 3, 2009 |
| No because they don't want a bad image from you to the company |
|
|
All 8 previous replies displayed. |