Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic I am proud to be white. Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [m]jakelong[/m] at 8:33 pm on Nov. 21, 2008[quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shem [quote]The children of Shem were Elam, Asshur, Aram, Arpachshad and Lud, in addition to daughters. Abraham, the patriarch of the Hebrews and Arabs, was one of the descendants of Arpachshad. The 1st century historian Flavius Josephus, among many others, recounted the tradition that these five sons were the progenitors of the nations of Elam, Assyria, Syria, Chaldea (from whom descended the Hebrews and Arabs), and Lydia, respectively. [/quote] [quote]Terms like "Semite" and "Hamite" are less common now, and may sometimes even be perceived as offensive, because of their "racial" connotations. The adjectival forms "Semitic" and "Hamitic" are more common, though the vague term 'Hamitic' dropped out of mainstream academic use in the 1960s. Semitic is still a commonly used term for the Semitic languages, as a subset of the Afro-Asiatic languages, denoting the common linguistic heritage of Arabic, Aramaic, Akkadian, Ethiopic, Hebrew and Phoenician languages.[/quote] [quote]Some believe that from Shem descend the whole of the European peoples. Ernest L. Martin writes, "...[The] Shemite tribes (people who were descendants of Shem and including some peoples who came from Abraham) later colonized the whole of southern Europe and replaced the people of JAVAN and his four descendants. JAVAN'S people were pushed mainly into the northern areas of Europe where in turn they migrated farther east into Asia (along with GOMER the firstborn son of JAPHETH and his descendants). Indeed, in prophecies dealing also with the End-Time, we find the people of JAVAN no longer in Europe, but they are now associated with TUBAL [Ezekiel 38: & 39 end time prophecy] (another son of JAPHETH) who became an eastern Mongolian type of people...though the name JAVAN still retained its geographical hold on the southern region of Europe, particularly in Greece)...It is not uncommon for people to give a name to a region and then the original people move on to other areas (or are killed off) and the original geographical name becomes associated with completely different people" [/quote] [quote]Some scholars have claimed that the Anglo-Saxons are the descendants of Shem. "Alfred, king of the Anglo-Saxons [b. 849 A.D.] was... the son [descendant] of Sem [Shem]" (Church Historians of England, vol. 2, p. 443). Proponents of this theory also claim that Alfred the Great was a descendant of Shem because he claimed to descend from Sceafa, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. Le Petit, a writer in 1601 mentioned King Adel, said to be descendant of Shem, ruler of Britain having 3 children that migrated to India. Further, it is said[who?] that Tuitsch a German patriarch is none other than Shem himself (see Assyrian-German theory). [/quote] [quote]According to Abulgazi, Shem's original land was Iran while Japheth's was the country called "Kuttup Shamach," said to be the name of the regions between the Caspian Sea and India. [9] According to Armenian tradition, Dr. Hales is quoted saying, "To the sons of Shem was alloted the middle region of the earth viz., Palestine, Syria, Assyria, Samaria (Shinar?) Babel (or Babylonia), Persia and Hedjaz (Arabia).[10] In Mystery of the Ages, by Dr. James Modlish, it is said that India is inhabited by Shemites.[11] Hisham Ibn al-Kalbi, a 19th century Arab historian, states that al-Hind and al-Sind [India] are of Ophir, the son of Joktan[12]. Isidore of Seville (c. 635) had also made Joktan the ancestor of Indians; his material was based on earlier enumerations made by Jerome and Josephus, who had stated that Joktan's descendants "inhabited from Cophen, an Indian river, and in part of Asia adjoining to it."[/quote] Hey that would make the Shemites were the original aryans!!! Yay!  :biggrin: [/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post sunshineshower Posted at 12:39 pm on Nov. 9, 2008 Discuss.

Replies jakelong Posted at 1:26 pm on Nov. 23, 2008 Quote: from sunshineshower at 3:27 am on Nov. 23, 2008 Quote: from Catacomb at 8:47 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 9 pages, really. is it worth reading Its mostly just jakelong and kidd rune arguing. Yeah I know. If you want I can just stop. Then you can choose to argue with im or side with him or ignore it.   kidd rune Posted at 9:10 am on Nov. 23, 2008 Well let's see since his "black genome" side mixed with the black genome of his wife aren't his kids black?   So if he has no race does this mean that his kid are of a diffent race than he is? If he has no race and his children have no race they aren't a different race (Because they have no race). This question would only really make sense if he was actually Black. since blacks are often mixed ancestry anyway (since thier white ancestors loved to "destroy" their race by having sex with slaves) then their kids cannot have the same race as their parents do they? Blacks IN THE USA. And if their parents are 100% Black (As I've been using as examples this whole thread) then the kids will be 100% Black. And In fact since according to you people of mixed ancestry "have no race" then most black Americans have "no race!"  biologically No shit. In fact since they have no race then they cannot possibly destroy the white race by mixing with whites ! They would have to be 100% black to do that. WRONG! A mixed and White don't make a White. After all 0 + 100 = 100!!!! It's impossible to add 100 as only HALF of the genome is passed on. WN/WS view: It's important to be proud to be white Others; Who cares? WN/WS: It matters Others: Why? WN?WS: Because whites are dying out Others: So? WN?WS: You don't care about whites? Others: I don't care about races or keeping them pure WN/WS: you're wrong Incredibly shitty summary. The reason WHY you should be proud isn't because they're dying out - that's why a White nation needs to exist. And "Keeping them pure" is different than letting them survive. sunshineshower Posted at 3:27 am on Nov. 23, 2008 Quote: from Catacomb at 8:47 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 9 pages, really. is it worth reading Its mostly just jakelong and kidd rune arguing. jakelong Posted at 1:00 am on Nov. 23, 2008 Quote: from Catacomb at 12:20 am on Nov. 23, 2008 try to cut it down to five words Oh five words: "Waste of time and space" jakelong Posted at 12:46 am on Nov. 23, 2008 Summary of thread: ----------------------- WN/WS view: It's important to be proud to be white Others; Who cares? WN/WS: It matters Others: Why? WN?WS: Because whites are dying out Others: So? WN?WS: You don't care about whites? Others: I don't care about races or keeping them pure WN/WS: you're wrong etc... Side topics: ------------   Are jews white?   Does mixing "destroy" races?   ========== Summary of summary ------------------------- WN/WS: I am proud to be white Others: Who cares? Trust me you didn't miss much by skipping the whole thing   Catacomb Posted at 12:20 am on Nov. 23, 2008 Quote: from jakelong at 2:40 pm on Nov. 23, 2008 Quote: from Catacomb at 12:47 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 9 pages, really. is it worth reading Nope not at all. Feel free to skip it. well if you read could you give me the summary try to cut it down to five words jakelong Posted at 9:47 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 On quiz #1 Well let's see since his "black genome" side mixed with the black genome of his wife aren't his kids black?   So if he has no race does this mean that his kid are of a diffent race than he is?   On quiz #2 since blacks are often mixed ancestry anyway (since thier white ancestors loved to "destroy" their race by having sex with slaves) then their kids cannot have the same race as their parents do they? And In fact since according to you people of mixed ancestry "have no race" then most black Americans have "no race!"  biologically In fact since they have no race then they cannot possibly destroy the white race by mixing with whites ! They would have to be 100% black to do that. After all 0 + 100 = 100!!!! Oooh yes I love your 'reasonings"   kidd rune Posted at 9:07 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 Quote: from jakelong at 11:40 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 Quiz #1: Are Obama's kids the "same race" as he is? Quiz #2: If a black person marries a white, are his kids the same race as he is or not? He has no race so 1 is unanswerable. The second can be answered in two ways. Biologically - no. Socially (In the USA) - yes (one drop rule) jakelong Posted at 8:40 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 Quiz #1: Are Obama's kids the "same race" as he is? Quiz #2: If a black person marries a white, are his kids the same race as he is or not? kidd rune Posted at 8:32 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 Quote: from jakelong at 11:27 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 So if you are mixed you are a "different race" than your parents? No - but you're not the same race as your parents. jakelong Posted at 8:27 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 So if you are mixed you are a "different race" than your parents? kidd rune Posted at 8:01 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 Quote: from jakelong at 10:30 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 What race would your kids be if they are of a "different race" than you? I meant they'd be mixed. jakelong Posted at 7:40 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 Quote: from Catacomb at 12:47 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 9 pages, really. is it worth reading Nope not at all. Feel free to skip it. Bonolove Posted at 7:34 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 that's nice to know...i'm not proud of anything.... jakelong Posted at 7:30 pm on Nov. 22, 2008 What race would your kids be if they are of a "different race" than you? Most recent 15 of 144 previous replies displayed.