Quote: from Forever Angel at 6:03 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Aimforthehead at 10:54 pm on July 9, 2009 Sure works in some places. Name a few. Yugoslavia, until it fell apart, lulz.
Quote: from Aimforthehead at 10:54 pm on July 9, 2009 Sure works in some places. Name a few.
Sure works in some places.
Yugoslavia, until it fell apart, lulz.
Quote: from Moridin at 4:42 pm on July 11, 2009 Quite a strange comment as communism is a stateless ideology in its purest form. I was speaking about in practice. On paper, if it were somehow realistic, it would be closer to a direct democracy, in a way. But yes that would be a different situation all together.
Quite a strange comment as communism is a stateless ideology in its purest form.
Practice? You mean the dictatorship of the proletariat or?
Quote: from Aimforthehead at 7:11 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Forever Angel at 9:03 pm on July 9, 2009 Quote: from Aimforthehead at 10:54 pm on July 9, 2009 Sure works in some places. Name a few. Oh you know. Here and there. Small communes usually. On a large scale it's pretty useless, hella efficient, but only for a short while. What's interesting is, Communism = Capitalism. The only single difference is the degree to which the state interferes. Economically speaking, of course. Claiming that communism is equal to capitalism is like calming that atheists who accept evolution are Christian creationists. Communism rejects private ownership and property rights, capitalism has those things as premise.
Quote: from Forever Angel at 9:03 pm on July 9, 2009 Quote: from Aimforthehead at 10:54 pm on July 9, 2009 Sure works in some places. Name a few. Oh you know. Here and there. Small communes usually. On a large scale it's pretty useless, hella efficient, but only for a short while. What's interesting is, Communism = Capitalism. The only single difference is the degree to which the state interferes. Economically speaking, of course.
Claiming that communism is equal to capitalism is like calming that atheists who accept evolution are Christian creationists.
Communism rejects private ownership and property rights, capitalism has those things as premise.
I am a communist.That is most of the posters here would say I was since they know so little about it.In fact I am a socialist. To date in Marxist terms there have not yet been any communist societies so it is wrong to say Communism has failed There have been many different types of Capiltalist societies .Most have been failures.American capitalism is a tragedy for the world As a socialist I believe as follows That all people are created equal & have the right to life liberty the persuit of happiness,a house weatherproof warm & durable,sufficient food to enable them to participate fully in society,sufficient income to participate fully in society, sufficient leisure & holidays to enjoy what society & nature offers,the right to free health care & education.The right to a job Most socialists would agree with these Most socialists would also agree that the basics of life - food water air land housing are too vital to be owned by individuals & should be owned by the society - not necessarily the government. They would agree that individuals do not create wealth but groups do & that the group should share with some equity in the wealth created so that there are no very rich or very poor. They would agree that all since all production involves large groups the profits should be owned by the large group & the enterprize owned by the the large group Thus Capitalim = social production + private ownership+private profit Socialism = social production = social profit + social ownweship It is very civilized & fair.Almost Christian What is your fear - apart from ignorance
You cannot believe in individual rights and be against ownership of property such as food, water and land.
You cannot be rational and not believe that individuals do not create wealth.
"badass" is such a vague term that it can be applied to anything without meaning much.