---

I don't give color to countries. Only to flags.

---

---

It still does not "mess up" the race.

---

---

No one knows the %. But she has Maori ancestry.

---

---

Um no. Hes a lot of things but I can tell you he's not pro commie. He's a WN among other things.

---

---

 No reference to any idiom relating to race here

---

Look up many racial idioms and words and they'll have nothing.

---

As early as the 17th century slaves were brought in in by the Dutch from indonesia and madagascar. Then the Brits took over and brought in  Indians.

If Whites are SO GOOD at creating countries on their own why they ALWAYS NEED nonwhite slaves from somewhere else everywhere they go? Tell me that.

---

---

Wait what???

---

---

Africans were there first. But as usual the european newcomesrs decimated the population there.

If Whites really wanted to help ALL races then why do whites always go to NONWHITE countries and areas and "MESS UP" with the races THERE?

---

And Whites did it HISTORICALLY. Now guilt is spread around and we're treated like shit now.

---

Why do they even LEAVE Europe?

---

---

I see that one RACE dominates a country, population-wise and government-wise.

---

---

Mixing destroys race.

---

---

What's her name?

---

---

I thought he said he was a Neo-Nazi. I'll ask.

---

---

Look up many racial idioms and words and they'll have nothing.

---

---

Labor.

---

---

Wait what???

---

---

So Whites mess up races, but nonWhites don't?

---

---

And Whites did it HISTORICALLY.

---

---

---

Why do they even LEAVE Europe?

---

Is it that hard to figure out?

---

---

And I say so what? Proves shit.

---

So Nigeria is as much a White country as Iceland?

---

Since the genes reappear. I say no. We can do this till the end of te world you know.

---

---

Well Neo-Nazi =/= communist last I checked.

---

---

Yep and again shows they CAN'T do LABOR in other countries on their own. Pretty "superior" if you ask me...

---

---

Hehe you tripped on that one eh? Laid out the trap and you fell right for it. Nice. Just shows you its onot a one way street.

---

---

Because they were UNHAPPY in their shithole?

---

---

If a White man and a Black woman have a kid, he will have 50% White genes and 50% Black genes. HALF of the white genes are lost forever.  

---

One of my buds is white. He's got blond hair, blue eyes and they are round european. Guess what. His grandma is 100% asian.  Actually fuck I know 2 guys like that. the other one it was his grandad that's asian and the grandkid ended up also blond hair blue eye!

---

They can, they would just rather use free labor.

---

---

The Scandinavian countries didn't have Negro slaves imported

---

---

  Whites mess up races as much as nonWhites by mixing.  

---

---

Europe was a shithole? I'd like a few reasons why.

---

Post edited at 4:37 pm on Sep. 20, 2008 by jakelong

-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP

---

And if those kids marry mixed kids or even white kids those genes WILL reappear.  

---

So, if he reproduces with ANOTHER nonwhite, that kid will have 1/4 White ancestry (on average).

If he reproduces with a WHITE, their child will have 75% White ancestry (again, an average).

---

One of my buds is white. He's got blond hair, blue eyes and they are round european. Guess what. His grandma is 100% asian.  Actually fuck I know 2 guys like that. the other one it was his grandad that's asian and the grandkid ended up also blond hair blue eye!

---

If his Grandma is 100% Mongoloid, and, let's say his Grandpa is 100% White, they will produce a 50/50 child.
If that 50/50 individual reproduces with a 100% White, they will, in turn, create a 75% White individual, definitely enough to show quite a few White traits.

---

Buying and importing slaves isn't exactly FREE. Try again.

---

What would cost more, buying a slave or paying someone for their work?

---

Thats because they were in their own countries. But you wonder why they went to England and France and all those other countries to raid them and pillage them. And I bet they did bring back a few human live booty on their raids.

---

And the vast majority of them weren't Vikings or raiders, of course.

---

Oh good. Glad you don't think its just one-sided.

---

---

Must have been or else why did they leave it to go live some place else?

---

They wanted to discover the world and obtain riches.

Of course Europe wasn't as rich and arable as Africa, the Earths most fertile land, but it wasn't a shit-hole.

And, as you know, it was A LOT more technologically advanced than the rest of the world.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"

---

If he reproduces with a WHITE, their child will have 75% White ancestry (again, an average).

---

---

You think that a White trait can't possibly exist if someone isn't 100% White?

---

---

But they didn't have to pay the slaves, did they?

What would cost more, buying a slave or paying someone for their work?

---

---

Of course they used slaves, but they didn't use nonWhite slaves.

---

---

That's why I don't advocate racial mixing, it destroys all races.

---

---

That's an assumption, not proof.

---

---

They wanted to discover the world and obtain riches.

---

---

And, as you know, it was A LOT more technologically advanced than the rest of the world.

---

---

And after just 2 generations bam the pure whites can reappear.

---

---

Nope just showed you they DON'T disappear.

---

But, why did you say your friends have White traits with nonWhite ancestry? Haven't I been saying this the whole time?

---

Ask the economists. That's some debate that was going on before you showed up and no one fully agrees.

---

I assume having a slave itself would be cheaper.

There was also a large number of slaves due to the fact that Negroes reproduce more than Whites, another reason why they used them.

---

How do you know. If those "vikings" went all the way to South America as you claim.

---

Vikings went to the Americas, yes, but they didn't go, take a bunch of nonWhite slaves, and return to Scandinavia.

---

It doesn't really since the genes do reappear.

---

---

You mean they wer not rich enough in Europe? You mean Europe was not enough of a paradise?

---

---

By the 19th century yeah. In the 1500s it was touch and go.

---

In the 1400's when Whites stepped ashore in central Africa, they had no written language. They didn't have the wheel. Their clothing was basic loincloths made from untreated animal skins. Their houses were made of mud and sticks.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"

---

They simply have enough traits to be considered White, yet, in no way, are they "pure".

---

---

But, why did you say your friends have White traits with nonWhite ancestry? Haven't I been saying this the whole time?

---

---

I assume having a slave itself would be cheaper.

There was also a large number of slaves due to the fact that Negroes reproduce more than Whites, another reason why they used them.

---

---

Vikings went to the Americas, yes, but they didn't go, take a bunch of nonWhite slaves, and return to Scandinavia.

---

---

Why not? Because the 1/2 % of nonwhite in them? Ew!!!!

---

---

No what you say that the ONLY way to have what you call "white" traits is through white ancestry. Thats way extreme and plain false.

---

---

Just shows though they can't even reproduce fast enough to work their own land. They could do it back in the Middle Ages though. Guess they lost the touch by the 19th century. Too much inbreeding I guess.

---

Slaves didn't get an education and were born slaves-and died slaves.

The slave-owners children were sent to school, had jobs, and, sometimes, worked WITH the slaves.

And no, inbreeding doesn't really happen like you say it does. It's pretty rare nowadays and back then (except in Africa).

---

And they were right because if they did scandinavia would be retty nonwhite by now!

---

---

A White trait is a trait that originated in WHITES.

---

blond hair
blue eye
Rosy cheeks
etc...
are exclusive to whites.

There is no such thing as a WHITE trait.

As for orgin we don't know the origin and race of most of our ancestors. As Bud24 told you race was not something people cared about in ancient civilizations.

---

 The slave-owners children were sent to school, had jobs, and, sometimes, worked WITH the slaves.

---

I also like how you fall for my baits every time I say "inbreeding" or "Shitholes". Its way fun man.
 

---

The nonWhites in Scandinavia nowadays are almost all Asylum Seekers (and Lapps).

---

Conclusion:

1. Don't go colonize other countries if you are a race nationalist or you mess up their race and they mess up yours.

2. Don't take up slaves if you don't want to mess up your or other ppl race. Slave owners loved to fuck their slaves and make lots of mixed babies.

3. Stay in your little shit hole and nothing bad can come to you.


-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP

---

Circular reasoning.
Tell me a trait that is present among whites and ONLY among whites. None of the traits you mentioned

blond hair
blue eye
Rosy cheeks
etc...
are exclusive to whites.

There is no such thing as a WHITE trait.

As for orgin we don't know the origin and race of most of our ancestors. As Bud24 told you race was not something people cared about in ancient civilizations.

---

---

So? Still does not explain WHY they needed slaves in the first place. I like why you say "no" or "wrong" and then go talk about something completely unrelated.

---

---

2. Don't take up slaves if you don't want to mess up your or other ppl race. Slave owners loved to fuck their slaves and make lots of mixed babies.

---

---

3. Stay in your little shit hole and nothing bad can come to you.

---

---

1) Most traits originated in ONE person. If that ONE person was White, than it's a White trait and is only present in Whites and people with White ancestry.

---

---

Slaves were labor, how hard is it to understand WHY they needed slaves?

---

---

That's not necessarily true. Some Empires had slave dumps where they dumped all of their slaves for fear of them being in their own country. Take France for example, they dumped all their slaves in Haiti. It's now over 95% Negro. It, also, is the shittiest country in the West.
Now, try to fuse that with France. Of course it would be worse, that's common sense.

---

Most of the nonwhites in Britain also come from their former colonies. Like India, Pakistan, Jamaica, etc...If they didn't go mess around there they wouldn't show up in England.

Just shows you: if you DON'T mess around in nonwhite countries they won't show up at your doorstep!

---

Again, it wasn't a shithole

---

---

1. A FEW traits originate in one person not MOST traits

---

---

2. Give sources to that claim if they exist

---

Should I also give you a guide on how to wipe your ass?

---

3. IF is a big question and NOT proven

---

As the blue eyed trait that you see originiated in one person in the Black Sea region, they can assume that it's a White trait. The fact that White populations normally have it is ALSO a good indication.

And the fact that the countries you claim to have them, such as Iran and whatnot, had migrations FROM the Black Sea region and there is written records of Whites going to that area.

But, if you think that small, almost impossible chance is what happened, you go right on ahead and believe it!

---

One wonders. If they are so GOOD at "working their ass off" and "creating countries" why do they need OUTSIDE help? Hmm maybe because they are just a bunch of FAIL?

---

People keep slaves because people need a source of labour. Slaves are cheap because you would only buy or trade them and you wouldn't have to pay them.

It's easier to tell someone else to do work for you then to do it yourself.

You see, it wasn't viewed as morally wrong in any way back then to have slaves. To them, slaves weren't human, couldn't contribute anything to society, were property, and were savage beasts that needed a reason to live. With this in mind, they used them as work.

But, if you think all people that owned slaves were a bunch of fail, humans are just a large pile of fail, aren't they?

---

Actually theres a shitload of nonwhites in France these days. ALL from their former colonies: Algeria, Nigeria, all kinds of African colonies, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam.

---

---

Most of the nonwhites in Britain also come from their former colonies. Like India, Pakistan, Jamaica, etc...If they didn't go mess around there they wouldn't show up in England.

---

---

Just shows you: if you DON'T mess around in nonwhite countries they won't show up at your doorstep!

---

---

If they loved it so much they wouldn't go live someplace else. Scandinavia wasn't the most colonizing country in Europe. Most of it was from Britain (shitty weather, shitty kings) France (revolutions and shitty leaders), Spain (crazy kings and queens, inquisitions) and Netherlands (shitty weather, tiny country)

---

It wasn't that they hated their countries, but that their small stretches of land weren't enough.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"