---

Parts wont be as cheap as you think for Camaros. They wont be ungodly high but they're gonna be more expensive than say an Impala or Cavalier.

---

But as far as new, quality parts go you have to figure Camaro's are common, popular cars. People like 'em, and a lot were made. So parts can't be too bad. Where as a car like mine, I had to have new control arms shipped from California (one of three states that had them) for an incredibly hefty price, all said and done.

---

Oh and by the way... just because theres a modification background for Camaros, does not mean those parts are cheap. Sure you can FIND parts easy but they wont be cheap.

---

Post edited at 8:24 pm on Oct. 3, 2009 by ss454

-------
So if you're tired of the same old story, turn some pages;
I'll be here when you're ready to roll with the changes

---

Not much is the same

---

Sort of just backs up my hypothesis that muscle cars are just pickup trucks shaped like coupes.

---

Same engines?

---

---

Quote: from ss454 at 10:42 am on Oct. 4, 2009

---

Same engines?

---

Early model fourth gens do. Didn't the LS1s only come in 97?

---

Early had the LT1s Not the same as a normal 350

Post edited at 3:16 pm on Oct. 4, 2009 by ss454

-------
So if you're tired of the same old story, turn some pages;
I'll be here when you're ready to roll with the changes

Anywho, out of that list I would go with the Volvo because it has less mileage than the others.  The Camaro and the Mustang are going to suck your gas money down. Also, insurance on them will be more because they are a "Sports" car.

My friend Samantha just traded in her 2001 Ford focus that had close to the same amount of mileage as the one you listed. Her engine was dying. I would avoid Ford vehicles with that many miles.

Out of the two, I'd go with the Pontiac or the Volvo.

-------
Just because a heart is broken
doesn't mean it stops beating.