---

but she's not engaged in sex, just posing nude. So what!!

---

Secondly, there are thousands of paedophiles on the internet. Do we really want to give them even more material to look at?

But I don't see why in some places we're allowed to participate in sex at sixteen, but can't take photos, but oh well.

---

Quote: from cettemoi at 9:10 am on July 9, 2009

---

Quote: from VALIENT at 7:09 am on July 9, 2009

---

Ok say it wasn't illegal. Where would the problem lie?

---

 
 they are still ganna be too young!!!

---

If they're old enough to pee they're old enough for me.

---

lol

-------
American badman in England

---

Quote: from yssuPevoLI at 8:17 pm on July 9, 2009

---

but she's not engaged in sex, just posing nude. So what!!

---

A twelve year old girl is far underage - she may have not even hit puberty at that point.

Secondly, there are thousands of paedophiles on the internet. Do we really want to give them even more material to look at?

But I don't see why in some places we're allowed to participate in sex at sixteen, but can't take photos, but oh well.

---

Many 12 year old girls could easily pass for 18, just look around. But what I'm saying is, if she is just posing nude, and consented to that, without any sexual activity, whats the problem with that.

-------
I am the spider

---

Once again, there's a difference between porn and sexual activity. What if you saw two different sets pictures, Set A and Set B. Each set has 10 pictures. Set A is a beautiful redhead, Set B is a blond. Each set starts with the girl in a bikini, the next picture she takes her top off, the next the bottom and so on. The last few photos of each set shows the girl laying with her legs wide open for everyone to see. Both girls are hot. There is no sexual activity depicted in the photos, just a beautiful naked girl, still considered porn. Later you find out that the girl in Set A is 19 years old, the girl in Set B is 12. You didn't know or couldn't tell the difference. Is anything wrong with that?

---

obviously.

---

4chan needs to gtfo of this forums now. Child pornography is horrible...

---

No it isn't.

-------
Trouble finding something?
I got a bitch name Keisha she a real dick pleasa
Call me Ziploc, cause I keep it fresh.
Facebook me: My black ass

there are thousands of paedophiles on the internet. Do we really want to give them even more material to look at?

one of the reasons that paedophiles look at children in a sexual manner is because many of them have a Porn Addiction. I know this sounds goofy and "unreal", but in fact it is a diagnosable disease. They start looking at regular porn, eventually get bored with that. They start looking for more extreme content. From Regular porn to things like Fisting, extreme insertions, Bestiality, and then eventually it leads to "Child Porn".
In the American society, we have always been taught that naked pictures of children under the age of 18 is wrong. But I see it like this; If we slowly introduce into the US pictures of children nude, the paedophiles will not find it "extreme". It will turn into another regular category. As in Anal, GLBT, Straight Sex, etc.
So to sum this up, I am pro for pictures of children nude. NOT because I like to see them nude, It is because I think that once these pictures are brought in and showed, it will lower the number of Paedophiles "creeping" on Elementary, and Middle school aged children.

-------
"Up the airy mountain, Down the rushy glen, We daren't go ahunting, for fear of
little men." - Willy Wonka

---

It's... a child, man...

---

Its messed up.

-------
myspace: http://www.myspace.com/dayum_its_ihe
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1173431286

---

Quote: from AmazingRed at 8:03 am on July 10, 2009

---

Quote: from yssuPevoLI at 8:17 pm on July 9, 2009

---

but she's not engaged in sex, just posing nude. So what!!

---

A twelve year old girl is far underage - she may have not even hit puberty at that point.  

 Secondly, there are thousands of paedophiles on the internet. Do we really want to give them even more material to look at?  

 But I don't see why in some places we're allowed to participate in sex at sixteen, but can't take photos, but oh well.

---

Many 12 year old girls could easily pass for 18, just look around. But what I'm saying is, if she is just posing nude, and consented to that, without any sexual activity, whats the problem with that.

---

As far as that fetish goes, I guess that's fine, but I draw the line at children. Let them have their innocence I say.