LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 388 users online 221559 members 445 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
roflfuckyou
Supportiveness: 88.25%
Mood: Lifeless
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
3 online / 20 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic

Science V Faith
The final showdown?
Replies: 20Last Post July 18 7:26am by Event Horizon
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 Email Print Favorite
Moridin


Guru

Ad Free
Reply
Quote: from Event Horizon at 6:26 am on June 29, 2009

Quote: from Moridin at 4:20 pm on June 28, 2009

You reposed this nonsense here? Sad. I said it before and ill say it again: science is backed by evidence, faith is not. Therefore, science beats faith every time.

Posted it here first. got no responses.

You've misread the post again. I'm not sure it's valid, but the objections you've raised have been less than convincing for why this is wrong.  

Prior to our knowledge of gravity wells, we thought that masses simply attracted. while our predictions and calculations were close approximations, and newtonian mechanics still worked pretty well for large, slow bodies, the overall understanding of the reality of things was wrong. This is what I'm talking about.


Since they where close approximations, they where not wrong. That's the whole point.

-------
"The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the
shoreline of wonder" (Ralph W. Sockman)


10:19 am on July 1, 2009 | Joined: April 2006 | Days Active: 596
Join to learn more about Moridin Sweden | Asexual Male | Posts: 12,785 | Points: 20,140
LiveWire Humor
( Event Horizon )


Connoisseur

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Moridin at 1:19 pm on July 1, 2009

Quote: from Event Horizon at 6:26 am on June 29, 2009

Quote: from Moridin at 4:20 pm on June 28, 2009

You reposed this nonsense here? Sad. I said it before and ill say it again: science is backed by evidence, faith is not. Therefore, science beats faith every time.
 

 Posted it here first. got no responses.  

 You've misread the post again. I'm not sure it's valid, but the objections you've raised have been less than convincing for why this is wrong.

 Prior to our knowledge of gravity wells, we thought that masses simply attracted. while our predictions and calculations were close approximations, and newtonian mechanics still worked pretty well for large, slow bodies, the overall understanding of the reality of things was wrong. This is what I'm talking about.


Since they where close approximations, they where not wrong. That's the whole point.


Yup. 2.8 = 3

-------
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful.It's the transition
that's troublesome.
  --Isaac Asimov


2:52 pm on July 1, 2009 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 362
Join to learn more about Event Horizon New York, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 3,194 | Points: 7,647
Audioblood


Personal Assistant
Reply
I know, right?! Totally the same thing. I mean, it's not like anything actually happens within a fraction of a second...oh...wait...


Wikipedia: Today, time intervals can be measured extremely precisely, to the point where the metre is now defined officially as the distance light travels in "vacuum" in 1⁄299,792,458 of a second.


-------
This is how we bleed in audio.

10:12 pm on July 1, 2009 | Joined: June 2009 | Days Active: 4
Join to learn more about Audioblood Georgia, United States | Lesbian Male | Posts: 120 | Points: 160
( Event Horizon )


Connoisseur

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Audioblood at 1:12 am on July 2, 2009

I know, right?! Totally the same thing. I mean, it's not like anything actually happens within a fraction of a second...oh...wait...


Wikipedia: Today, time intervals can be measured extremely precisely, to the point where the metre is now defined officially as the distance light travels in "vacuum" in 1⁄299,792,458 of a second.

I'm not sure I get it...?

-------
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful.It's the transition
that's troublesome.
  --Isaac Asimov


8:16 pm on July 8, 2009 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 362
Join to learn more about Event Horizon New York, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 3,194 | Points: 7,647
Ken01


Advisor
Reply
Personally I believe faith cannot be compared to science. Although they are both belief methods, faith is outside the realm of science. I consider religion science plus some. Religion is the entire Oreo cookie and science is the cream. No matter how much to try to explain and describe the outside cookie, you can't if you only know cream.

In even simpler terms, comparing science to religion, mysticism, faith, is futile because they're not comparable. Even though faith can operate with much of science, science cannot with faith. Therefore trying to explain faith in scientific terms is also futile. That is why you can't PROVE or DISPROVE a religion; because you're trying to use science to do so.

I suppose this is much more of a rant than a coherent thought, but try to understand. :)


3:08 am on July 16, 2009 | Joined: July 2009 | Days Active: 38
Join to learn more about Ken01 Florida, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 144 | Points: 537
( Event Horizon )


Connoisseur

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Ken01 at 6:08 am on July 16, 2009

Personally I believe faith cannot be compared to science. Although they are both belief methods, faith is outside the realm of science. I consider religion science plus some. Religion is the entire Oreo cookie and science is the cream. No matter how much to try to explain and describe the outside cookie, you can't if you only know cream.

In even simpler terms, comparing science to religion, mysticism, faith, is futile because they're not comparable. Even though faith can operate with much of science, science cannot with faith. Therefore trying to explain faith in scientific terms is also futile. That is why you can't PROVE or DISPROVE a religion; because you're trying to use science to do so.

I suppose this is much more of a rant than a coherent thought, but try to understand. :)


Comparing the principles of science and faiths often leads to nonsense. But that does not mean that they are not comparable.

-------
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful.It's the transition
that's troublesome.
  --Isaac Asimov


7:26 am on July 18, 2009 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 362
Join to learn more about Event Horizon New York, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 3,194 | Points: 7,647
Pages: 1 2 Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

Prereq. Intellectual Test
You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic