LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 591 users online 221567 members 695 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
audrey820
Cool Things: ur mom
Mood: Paranoid
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
5 online / 24 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic

Are Libertarians Inherently Selfish?
Replies: 96Last Post July 7, 2008 6:39am by Radon
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next » Email Print Favorite
Web Resources: Rape Myths Dispelled, Help & Information about Rape
USA Rape, Abuse and Incest Hotline: 1-800-656-HOPE (1-800-656-4673)
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
Web Resources: Drug Myths Dispelled, Drug & Alcohol Information
USA Drug Abuse Hotline: 1-800-662-4357
Choice Votes Percent  
Yes 9 13%
No 15 23%
Depends on the libertarian in question. 22 33%
As selfish as those of any other political party. 19 29%
Vote Now! 65 Votes Cast
Apotheosis



Patron
Reply
yes, they're selfish

selflessness i find immoral and retarded though

Post edited at 7:56 am on June 15, 2008 by Apotheosis


7:56 am on June 15, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2004 | Days Active: 1,014
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | Posts: 20,582 | Points: 33,185
LiveWire Humor
Kokasion


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Apotheosis at 7:56 am on June 15, 2008

yes, they're selfish

selflessness i find immoral and retarded though


Immoral, if you have a family maybe? But yes, definitely retarded.

-------
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means
What you think it means." -Inigo Montoya


1:29 pm on June 15, 2008 | Joined: April 2008 | Days Active: 83
Join to learn more about Kokasion South Carolina, United States | GLBT Ally Male | Posts: 1,092 | Points: 1,962
jakelong


Swami

Ad Free
Reply
its not selflessness vs selfish

There's something in between the 2 choice unless you a retard

-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP


6:20 pm on June 15, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 766
Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,200 | Points: 25,033
MushroomSatsujin


Smoke

Patron
Reply
Humans in general are inherently selfish

-------
And you, demon, what do you have faith in?
Nothing. I am so exquisitely empty

6:45 pm on June 15, 2008 | Joined: April 2007 | Days Active: 528
Join to learn more about MushroomSatsujin Vatican City | GLBT Ally | Posts: 27,536 | Points: 33,380
Apotheosis



Patron
Reply
Quote: from jakelong at 9:20 pm on June 15, 2008

its not selflessness vs selfish

There's something in between the 2 choice unless you a retard


i'm against actions motivated by anything but self-interest

7:08 pm on June 15, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2004 | Days Active: 1,014
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | Posts: 20,582 | Points: 33,185
mikeg80


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Yes, libertarians generally ARE selfish; however, "selfishness" is NOT synonymous with "immoral" or "evil" as our teachers, professors, politicians, etc., would have us believe.

Consider the following, taken from the introduction to Ayn Rand's "The Virtue of Selfishness":

"There is a fundamental moral difference between a man who sees his self-interest in production and a man who sees it in robbery. The evil of a robber does not lie in the fact that he pursues his own interests, but in what he regards as to his own interest; not in the fact that he pursues his values, but in what he chose to value; not in the fact that he wants to live, but in the fact that he wants to live on a subhuman level (see 'The Objectivist Ethics').

"If it is true that what I mean by 'selfishness' is not what is meant conventionally, then this is one of the worst indictments of altruism: it means that altruism permits no concept of a self-respecting, self-supporting man--a man who supports his life by his own effort and neither sacrifices himself nor others. It means that altruism permits no view of men except as sacrificial animals and profiteers-on-sacrifice, as victims and parasites--that it permits no concept of a benevolent co-existence among men--that it permits no concept of justice."

As this passage applies to your question, libertarians ARE selfish in that they desire to create, and profit from what they create. They ARE selfish in that they do NOT believe that one is entitled to the fruits of another's creativity or productivity.

The socialist (or communist, fascist, statist, or virtually any other "-ist" EXCEPT the individualist or egoist), on the other hand, regards the fruits of OTHERS' creativity and production as being in the socialist's self-interest, and belonging, to a certain extent, to the socialist. The socialist believes that the producer has an obligation to sacrifice the fruits of his production for "the common good," thus putting the producer on the level of a slave or a sacrificial animal, subordinate to the "master." Libertarians view those of this "entitlement" mentality as robbers or parasites.

Post edited at 10:29 am on June 17, 2008 by mikeg80


7:14 pm on June 15, 2008 | Joined: July 2005 | Days Active: 359
Join to learn more about mikeg80 California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 156 | Points: 3,900
Apotheosis



Patron
Reply
fuck yeah for ayn rand

7:19 pm on June 15, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2004 | Days Active: 1,014
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | Posts: 20,582 | Points: 33,185
nocturne20


Personal Assistant
Reply
"Libertarianism is almost the polar opposite of selfishness for the most selfish thing to do is to mandate one's own beliefs on others via force.  Libertarians don't want to enforce morality in the bedroom or the boardroom on others they simply want to live and let live with the protection of the defense of their own and other's rights in place. " Agreed.

Many libertarian policies result in more personal freedom, less use of governmental force against the non-consenting, but also improves society as a whole. How functional is something like the drug war, incarcerating 2.1 million in the US, spending billions per year, making drugs less safe AND not changing the illegal drug supply or lowering drug use? How functional is governmental laws requiring businesses to give health insurance, health care specifically in the form of insurance? Does making prostitution illegal really protect women and men, or does it make them more subject to hate crimes because the police won't protect them (this is especially important since many hate crimes against women are done against prostitutes/sex workers)? Making things illegal doesn't necessarily eliminate them, it can also makes things worse. Libertarianism recognizes the problems that overimposing government bureaucracy and inefficiency has on not only individuals but also society as a whole. Live and let live - if it doesn't hurt anyone else, why is it in anyone's business to make others unhappy and therefore increase dysfunction and crime?


9:03 pm on June 16, 2008 | Joined: June 2008 | Days Active: 18
Join to learn more about nocturne20 New York, United States | Posts: 28 | Points: 209
iconoclast

corporate drone

Patron
Reply
Really depends. To be realistic, people are too stupid to take hard capitalism and absolute libertarianism right now. Until they can get smarter, libertarianism pertaining to personal decisions combined with regulated capitalism or quasi-socialism is the only way to go. Realistically, if pure libertarianism took hold now, a few would just seize power, and keep everyone even more stupid.

-------
join this group only if youre a mod

9:42 pm on June 16, 2008 | Joined: April 2005 | Days Active: 792
Join to learn more about iconoclast New Jersey, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 37,384 | Points: 48,675
Apotheosis



Patron
Reply
Not really. The stupid would end up starving to death.

5:28 am on June 17, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2004 | Days Active: 1,014
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | Posts: 20,582 | Points: 33,185
Kokasion


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Apotheosis at 5:28 am on June 17, 2008

Not really. The stupid would end up starving to death.

YES! Plleeeaaassseeee!

-------
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means
What you think it means." -Inigo Montoya


8:22 am on June 17, 2008 | Joined: April 2008 | Days Active: 83
Join to learn more about Kokasion South Carolina, United States | GLBT Ally Male | Posts: 1,092 | Points: 1,962
MarkHi88


Executive
Reply
I suppose libertarians are selfish, in the same way breathing is selfish.

-------
www.antiwar.com

9:00 am on June 17, 2008 | Joined: Jan. 2007 | Days Active: 241
Join to learn more about MarkHi88 Ohio, United States | GLBT Ally Male | Posts: 1,028 | Points: 3,480
Kokasion


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
That's MY AIR!

-------
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means
What you think it means." -Inigo Montoya

9:03 am on June 17, 2008 | Joined: April 2008 | Days Active: 83
Join to learn more about Kokasion South Carolina, United States | GLBT Ally Male | Posts: 1,092 | Points: 1,962
finchmiester


Lawn Care Specialist
Reply
  the libertarian party of america and those around the world are constantly in strife with themselves, from abortion to welfare to social security to isolationism, but they all agree on one thing live and let live. Libertarians are at there heart selfless so selfless that they in fact may be seen as selfish. They dont care what you do how you do it or why you do it as long as it doesnt cost them anything. That is not selfish it is selfless, all are free to do as they will as long as others are not harmed. Now the severity of those freedoms are argued on in the party but for the most part it is a party that demands personal responsibility over forceful repression which leads many to see selfish reasonings while it is only hopeful freedom.
This may seem selfish as it seems they only care about there own rights but in fact they care about everyones so much that they are unwilling to force anything on anyone. No one who lives by a code of live and let live can be considered selfish as it merely hopes for equality without force, not forceful equality for the benefit of so group.

    Welfare is a failed system but like so many failed systems it should not be scraped but revised, which is a point many libertarians disagree upon.


4:39 pm on June 17, 2008 | Joined: June 2008 | Days Active: 4
Join to learn more about finchmiester United States | Posts: 48 | Points: 89
Apotheosis



Patron
Reply
finchmiester, that's not selfless, that's one twisted representation just to avoid the word selfish like an ultimate evil

selfishness is good man


6:39 pm on June 17, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2004 | Days Active: 1,014
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | Posts: 20,582 | Points: 33,185
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next » Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic